Examples of our experience

FPA Patent Attorneys provides expert advice on contentious and other hearing matters, helping our clients to achieve the best outcomes.  Examples of our opposition and hearing experience are listed below. In addition, we have assisted many clients to obtain a favourable settlement in contentious matters, without the matter progressing to a hearing.

Apple Inc [2018] APO 91, [2018] APO 72, [2018] APO 54, [2017] ADO 2, [2017] ADO 3, [2017] ADO 4, [2017] ADO 5, [2017] ADO 6 and [2017] ADO 7

Artisent, LLC [2017] ADO 3

Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Koninklijke Douwe Egberts BV [2018] APO 15

Caterpillar Inc. v ESCO Corporation [2016] APO 30 and [2016] APO 74

Dorel Australia Pty Ltd v HBG IP Holding Pty Ltd [2019] APO 9 and [2019] APO 12

eBay Inc. [2019] APO 10

Evolva SA [2017] APO 57

Gabriele Ludwig v The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of The University of Arizona [2018] APO 55

Meat & Livestock Australia Limited and Dairy Australia Limited v Cargill, Inc. and Branhaven LLC [2016] APO 26

Mine RP Holdings (Pty) Limited [2018] APO 41

Novavax, Inc. v GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA [2018] APO 84

Nufarm Australia Ltd v Dow AgroSciences LLC [2014] APO 33 and [2017] APO 52

Qutotec Oyj v Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation [2015] APO 78

Sandoz AG v Leo Laboratories Limited [2015] APO 41

University of Wyoming Research Corporation v Ciris Energy, Inc. [2016] APO 3

Vermeer Manufacturing Company v Wirtgen GmbH [2015] APO 14